![]() |
|
Patent
Law of the People's Republic of China |
|
Article
2. In this Law, "inventions-creations" mean inventions, utility models and designs. Article
3. The Patent Administration Department under the State Council is responsible for the patent work throughout the country. It receives and examines patent applications and grants patent rights for inventions-creations in accordance with law. Article 4. Where an invention-creation for which a patent is applied for relates to the security or other vital interests of the State and is required to be kept secret, the application shall be treated in accordance with the relevant prescriptions of the State. Article
5. No patent right shall be granted for any invention-creation that is contrary to the laws of the State or social morality or that is detrimental to public interest. Article
6. An invention-creation, made by a person in execution of the tasks of the entity to which he belongs, or made by him mainly by using the material and technical means of the entity is a service invention-creation. For a service invention-creation, the right to apply for a patent belongs to the entity. After the application is approved, the entity shall be the patentee. Article 7. No entity or individual shall prevent the inventor or creator from filing an application for a patent for a non-service invention-creation. Article 8. For an invention-creation jointly made by two or more entities or individuals, or made by an entity or individual in execution of a commission given to it or him by another entity or individual, the right to apply for a patent belongs, unless otherwise agreed upon, to the entity or individual that made, or to the entities or individuals that jointly made, the invention-creation. After the application is approved, the entity or individual that applied for it shall be the patentee. Article
9. For any identical invention-creation, only one patent right shall be granted. But where one applicant has filed applications for both patent for invention and patent for utility model for the identical invention-creation on the same day, the patent right for utility model has not yet been terminated and the applicant makes a statement to abandon the patent right for utility model, the patent right may be granted for the application for patent for invention. Article
10. The right to apply for a patent and the patent right may be assigned. Article
11. After the grant of the patent right for an invention or utility model, except where otherwise provided for in this Law, no entity or individual may, without the authorization of the patentee, exploit the patent, that is, make, use, offer to sell, sell or import the patented product, or use the patented process, and use, offer to sell, sell or import the product directly obtained by the patented process, for production or business purposes. Article
12. Any entity or individua1 exploiting the patent of another shall conclude with the patentee a license contract for exploitation and pay the patentee a fee for the exploitation of the patent. The licensee has no right to authorize any entity or individual, other than that referred to in the contract for exploitation, to exploit the patent. Article
13. After the publication of the application for a patent for invention, the applicant may require the entity or individual exploiting the invention to pay an appropriate fee. Article 14. Where any patent for invention, belonging to any State-owned enterprise or institution, is of great significance to the interest of the State or to the public interest, the competent departments concerned under the State council and the people's governments of provinces, autonomous regions or municipalities directly under the Central Government may, after approval by the State Council, decide that the patented invention be spread and applied within the approved limits, and allow designated entities to exploit that invention. The exploiting entity shall, according to the regulations of the State, pay a fee for exploitation to the patentee. Article
15. Where the co-owners of the right in regards to a patent application or a patent conclude an agreement on exercise of the right, the agreement shall apply. Where there is no such an agreement, each of the co-owners may individually exploit, or grant a non-exclusive license to others, to exploit the patent. In case of such a license, the license fee collected shall be distributed by all the co-owners. Article
16. The entity that is granted a patent right shall award to the inventor or creator of a service invention--creation a reward and, upon exploitation of the patented invention-creation, shall pay the inventor or creator a reasonable remuneration based on the extent of spreading and application and the economic benefits yielded. Article
17. The inventor or creator has the right to be named as such in the patent document. Article
18. Where any foreigner, foreign enterprise or other foreign organization having no habitual residence or business office in China files an application for a patent in China, the application sha1l be treated under this Law in accordance with any agreement concluded between the country to which the applicant belongs and China, or in accordance with any international treaty to which both countries are party, or on the basis of the principle of reciprocity. Article
19. Where any foreigner, foreign enterprise or other foreign organization having no habitual residence or business office in China applies for a patent, or has other patent matters to attend to, in China, it or he shall appoint a patent agency that is legally established to act as his or its agent. Article
20. Where any entity or individual intends to file an application in a foreign country for a patent for invention or utility model made in China, it or he shall report in advance to the patent administration department under the State Council for examination of secrecy. The procedures and time limits of the examination of secrecy shall conform to the provisions set forth by the State Council. Article
21. The Patent Administration Department under the State Council and its Patent Reexamination Board shall handle any patent application and patent-related request according to law and in conformity with the requirements for being objective, fair, correct and timely.
Article
23. Any design for which patent right may be granted must not belong to any prior design; neither has any entity or individual filed before the filing date with the Patent Administration Department under the State Council an application which described the identical design and was published in the patent documents after the said date of filing. Article
24. An invention-creation for which a patent is applied for does not lose its novelty where, within six months before the date of filing, one of the following events occurred: Article
25. For any of the following, no patent right shall be granted:
Article
26. Where an application for a patent for invention or utility model is filed, a request, a description and its abstract, and claims shall be submitted. Article
27. Where an application for a patent for design is filed, a request, drawings or photographs and brief description of the design shall be submitted. Article
28. The date on which the Patent Administration Department under the State Council receives the application shall be the date of filing. If the app1ication is sent by mail, the date of mailing indicated by the postmark shall be the date of filing. Article
29. Where, within twelve months from the date on which any applicant first filed in a foreign country an application for a Patent for invention or utility model, or within six months from the date on which any applicant first filed in a foreign country an application for a patent for design, he or it files in China an application for a patent for the same subject matter, he or it may, in accordance with any agreement concluded between the said foreign country and China, or in accordance with any international treaty to which both countries are party, or on the basis of the principle of mutual recognition of the right of priority, enjoy a right of priority. Article
30. Any applicant who claims the right of priority shall make a written declaration when the application is filed, and submit, within three months, a copy of the patent application document which was first filed; if the applicant fails to make the written declaration or to meet the time limit for submitting the patent application document, the claim to the right of priority shall be deemed not to have been made. Article
31. An application for a patent for invention or utility model shall be limited to one invention or uti1ity model. Two or more inventions or utility models belonging to a single general inventive concept may be filed as one application. Article
32. An applicant may withdraw his or its application for a patent at any time before the patent right is granted. Article
33. An applicant may amend his or its application for a patent, but the amendment to the application for a patent for invention or utility model may not go beyond the scope of the disclosure contained in the initial description and claims, and the amendment to the application for a patent for design may not go beyond the scope of the disclosure as shown in the initial drawings or photographs.
Article
34. Where, after receiving an application for a patent for invention, the Patent Administration Department under the State Council, upon preliminary examination, finds the application to be in conformity with the requirements of this Law, it shall publish the application promptly after the expiration of eighteen months from the date of filing. Upon the request of the applicant, the Patent Administration Department under the State Council publishes the application earlier. Article
35. Upon the request of the applicant for a patent for invention, made at any time within three years from the date of filing, the Patent Administration Department under the State Council will proceed to examine the application as to its substance. If, without any justified reason, the applicant fails to meet the time limit for requesting examination as to substance, the application shall be deemed to have been withdrawn. Article
36. When the applicant for a patent for invention requests examination as to substance, he or it shall furnish pre-filing date reference materials concerning the invention. Article
37. Where the Patent Administration Department under the State Council, after it has made the examination as to substance of the application for a patent for invention, finds that the application is not in conformity with the provisions of this Law, it shall notify the applicant and request him or it to submit, within a specified time limit, his or its observations or to amend the application. If, without any justified reason, the time limit for making response is not met, the application shall be deemed to have been withdrawn. Article
38. Where, after the applicant has made the observations or amendments, the Patent Administration Department under the State Council finds that the application for a patent for invention is still not in conformity with the provisions of this Law, the application shall be rejected. Article
39. Where it is found after examination as to substance that there is no cause for rejection of the application for a patent for invention, the Patent Administration Department under the State Council shall make a decision to grant the patent right for invention, issue the certificate of patent for invention, and register and announce it. The patent right for invention shall take effect as of the date of the announcement.
Article
40. Where it is found after preliminary examination that there is no cause for rejection of the application for a patent for utility model or design, the patent administration department under the State Council shall make a decision to grant the patent right for utility model or the patent right for design, issue the relevant patent certificate, and register and announce it. The patent right for utility model or design shall take effect as of the date of the announcement. Article
41. The Patent Administration Department under the State Council shall set up a Patent Reexamination Board. Where an applicant for patent is not satisfied with the decision of the said department rejecting the application, the applicant may, within three months from the date of receipt of the notification, request the Patent Reexamination Board to make a reexamination. The Patent Reexamination Board shall, after reexamination, make a decision and notify the applicant for patent.
Article
42. The duration of patent right for inventions shall be twenty years, the duration of patent right for utility models and patent right for designs shall be ten years, counted from the date of filing. Article
43. The patentee shall pay an annual fee beginning with the year in which the patent right was granted. Article
44. In any of the following cases, the patent right shall cease before the expiration of its duration: Article
45. Where, starting from the date of the announcement of the grant of the patent right by the Patent Administration Department under the State Council, any entity or individual considers that the grant of the said patent right is not in conformity with the relevant provisions of this Law, it or he may request the Patent Reexamination Board to declare the patent right invalid. Article
46. The Patent Reexamination Board shall examine the request for invalidation of the patent right promptly, make a decision on it and notify the person who made the request and the patentee. The decision declaring the patent right invalid shall be registered and announced by the Patent Administration Department under the State Council. Article
47. Any patent right which has been declared invalid shall be deemed to be non-existent from the beginning.
Article
48. Under one of the circumstances as follows, the Patent Administration Department under the State Council may, upon the request of an entity or an individual who is qualified to exploit the invention or utility model, grant a compulsory license to exploit the patent for invention or utility model: Article
49. Where a national emergency or any extraordinary state of affairs occurs, or where the public interest so requires, the Patent Administration Department under the State Council may grant a compulsory license to exploit the patent for invention or utility model. Article
50. For the purposes of public health, the Patent Administration Department under the State Council may, grant a compulsory license for manufacturing a patented drug and exporting it to the countries or regions in compliance with the relevant international treaties to which China is a party.
Article
51. Where the invention or utility model for which the patent right has been granted involves important technical advance of considerable economic significance in relation to another invention or utility model for which a patent right has been granted earlier and the exploitation of the later invention or utility model depends on the exploitation of the earlier invention or utility model, the Patent Administration Department under the State Council may, upon the request of the later patentee, grant a compulsory license to exploit the earlier invention or utility model. Article
52. Where the compulsory license relates to invention-creation of semiconductor technology, its exploitation shall be limited to serve public interest and to the situations as set forth by Paragraph 2 of Article 48 of this Law. Article
53. A compulsory license shall be granted mainly to serve the domestic market, except the compulsory license granted according to Paragraph 2 of Article 48 and Article 50 of this Law. Article
54. Any entity or individual, that applies for a compulsory license for exploitation in accordance with paragraph 1 of Article 48 or Article 51 of this Law, shall provide evidence to prove that he has requested the patentee for a license for exploitation of his patent on reasonable terms and conditions, but has not obtained the license within a reasonable period of time. Article
55. The decision made by the Patent Administration Department under the State Council granting a compulsory license for exploitation shall be notified promptly to the patentee concerned, and shall be registered and announced. Article
56. Any entity or individual that is granted a compulsory license for exploitation shall not have an exclusive right to exploit and shall not have the right to authorize exploitation by any others.
Article
57. The entity or individual that is granted a compulsory license for exploitation shall pay to the patentee a reasonable exploitation fee, or deal with the exploitation fee in accordance with the provisions of the relevant international treaties to which China is a party. For payment of the exploitation fee, the amount of which shall be fixed by both parties in consultations. Where the parties fail to reach an agreement, the Patent Administration Department under the State Council shall adjudicate.
Article 58. Where the patentee is not satisfied with the decision of the Patent Administration Department under the State Council granting a compulsory license for exploitation, or where the patentee or the entity or individual that is granted the compulsory license for exploitation is not satisfied with the ruling made by the Patent Administration Department under the State Council regarding the fee payable for exploitation, it or he may, within three months from the receipt of the date of notification, institute legal proceedings in the people's court.
Article
59. The extent of protection of the patent right for invention or utility model shall be determined by the terms of the claims. The description and the appended drawings may be used to interpret the terms of the claims. Article
60. Where a dispute arises as a result of the exploitation of a patent without the authorization of the patentee, that is, the infringement of the patent right of the patentee, it shall be settled through consultation by the parties. Where the parties are not willing to consult with each other or where the consultation fails, the patentee or any interested party may institute legal proceedings in the people's court, or request the administrative authority for patent affairs to handle the matter. When the administrative authority for patent affairs handling the matter considers that the infringement is established, it may order the infringer to stop the infringing act immediately. If the infringer is not satisfied with the order, he may, within 15 days from the date of receipt of the notification of the order, institutes legal proceedings in the people's court in accordance with the Administrative Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China. If, within the said time limit, such proceedings are not instituted and the order is not complied with, the administrative authority for patent affairs may approach the people's court for compulsory execution. The said authority handling the matter may, upon the request of the parties, mediate in the amount of compensation for the damage caused by the infringement of the patent right. If the mediation fails, the parties may institute legal proceedings in the people's court in accordance with the Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China. Article
61. Where any infringement dispute relates to a patent for invention for a process for the manufacture of a new product, any entity or individual manufacturing the identical product shall furnish proof to show that the process used in the manufacture of its or his product is different from the patented process. Article
62. In a patent infringement dispute, where a person accused for infringement has evidence to prove that the technology or design that he exploits belongs to prior art or prior design, no infringement of patent is constituted. Article
63. Where any person passes off the patent, he shall, in addition to bearing his civil liability according to law, be ordered by the administrative authority for patent affairs to amend his act, and the order shall be announced. His illegal earnings shall be confiscated and , in addition, he may be imposed a fine of not more than four times his illegal earnings and, if there is no illegal earnings, a fine of not more than RMB 200,000 yuan. Where the infringement constitutes a crime, he shall be prosecuted for his criminal liability. Article
64. In handling the act suspected of passing off of patent based on the evidence that has been obtained, administrative authority for patent affairs may make inquiries of the relevant persons, investigate into the matters pertinent to the act suspected of violation of laws; conduct on-spot inspection of the place where the act of the relevant persons is suspected of violation of laws; examine and make copy of the contract, invoices, accounting books and other materials relating to the act suspected of violation of laws; inspect the product relating to the act suspected of violation of laws, and may seal and detain the products as proved by evidence to pass off patent. Article
65. The amount of compensation for the damage caused by the infringement of the patent right shall be assessed on the basis of the actual losses suffered by the patentee; where the actual losses are difficult to be determined, it may be assessed on the basis of the profits which the infringer has earned through the infringement. If it is difficult to determine the losses which the patentee has suffered or the profits which the infringer has earned, the amount may be assessed by reference to the appropriate multiple of the amount of the exploitation fee of that patent under contractual license. The amount of compensation shall include the reasonable expenses incurred to the patentee for stopping the infringement. Article
66. Where any patentee or interested party has evidence to prove that another person is infringing or will soon infringethe patent right and that if such infringing act is not checked or prevented from occurring in time, it is likely to cause irreparable harm to it or him, it or he may, before any legal proceedings are instituted, request the people's court to adopt measures for ordering the suspension of relevant acts. Article
67. In order to stop the patent infringement, the patentee or interested party may, under circumstances where there is a likely-hood that evidence may be destroyed, lost or too difficult to obtain later on, request the court to preserve evidence before any legal proceedings are instituted. Article
68. Prescription for instituting legal proceedings concerning the infringement of patent right is two years counted from the date on which the patentee or any interested party obtains or should have obtained knowledge of the infringing act. Article
69. None of the following shall be deemed an infringement of the patent right: Article 70. Any person who, for production and business purposes, uses, offers to sell or sells a product of patent infringement, without knowing that it was made and sold without the authorization of the patentee, shall not be liable to compensate for the damage of the patentee if he can prove that he obtains the product from a legitimate source.
Article 71. Where any person, in violation of the provisions of Article 20 of this Law, files in a foreign country an application for a patent that divulges an important secret of the State, he shall be subject to disciplinary sanction by the entity to which he belongs or by the competent authority concerned at the higher level. Where a crime is established, the person concerned shall be prosecuted for his criminal liability according to the law.
Article 72. Where any person usurps the right of an inventor or creator to apply for a patent for a non-service invention-creation, or usurps any other right or interest of an inventor or creator, prescribed by this Law, he shall be subject to disciplinary sanction by the entity to which he belongs or by the competent authority at the higher level.
Article 73. The administrative authority for patent affairs may not take part in recommending any patented product for sale to the public or any such commercial activities. Article 74. Where any State functionary working for patent administration or any other State functionary concerned neglects his duty, abuses his power, or engages in malpractice for personal gain, which constitutes a crime, shall be prosecuted for his criminal liability in accordance with law. If the case is not serious enough to constitute a crime, he shall be given disciplinary sanction in accordance with law.
Article
75. Any application for a patent filed with, and any other proceedings before, the Patent Administration Department under the State Council shall be subject to the payment of a fee as prescribed.
Article
76. This Law shall enter into force on April 1, 1985.
|