The
Dispute Between the Two "Crocodile" Settled
Recently,
the French garment firm La Chemise Lacoste and the Hong Kong-based Crocodile
Garments Ltd. have reached conciliation on their trademark dispute over
the similar "crocodile" marks.
The
conciliation, which was approved by the Beijing High People's Court,
marks the first ever ending of the years-long lawsuit put forward by
the French firm against the Hong Kong-based Crocodile.
According to the agreement, Hong Kong-based Crocodile can use its current
"crocodile" mark until March 31, 2006, when a new mark should be used
on the condition that the new mark should not use the green color as
used in both the Lacoste's "crocodile" and the Hong Kong's "crocodile".
Lacoste agrees to waive all of its claims.
"The win-win agreement will lay the solid foundation for the intellectual
property rights protection of both sides, as well as helping to protect
our interests in the Chinese market," said a joint declaration released
after the conciliation was approved. The declaration also vowed that
the two companies would launch joint efforts to fight against pirated
products and seek full support from the Chinese government and judicial
organizations.
Established in 1933, Lacoste has its device mark "crocodile" registered
in over 190 countries and regions, including the registration in China
in 1980. However, when Lacoste began to sell its products in 1970's
in Hong Kong and Mainland China, serious trademark dispute arose between
Lacoste and the Hong Kong-based Crocodile, which obtained trademark
registration on a similar mark in 1950's. Thereafter, trademark war
continued between the two companies. In 1998, Lacoste initiated a lawsuit
against the Hong Kong-based Crocodile and a Beijing garment company
with the Beijing High People's Court claiming damages of 3.5 million
Yuan (US$423,000).
In spite of the settlement between the two parties, other lawsuits are
ongoing at the Beijing High People's Court and the Beijing No. 2 Intermediate
People's Court, including a similar lawsuit against a Singapore-based
Crocodile and other Chinese companies based on trademark infringement
and unfair competition.
|